Incoherence between systemic and skin tissue response to transfusion in volume-resuscitated patients withoutacute bleeding.

Alterations in skin blood flow (SBF) may help to detect occult hypoperfusion in critically ill patients after fluid resuscitation. In this study, SBF is globally unaltered by red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) in non-bleeding critically ill patients after initial resuscitation; however, 37.5% of patients showed a significant increase in SBF. No correlation between relative changes in SBF and systemic variables after RBCT was observed.

Transfusion increased skin blood flow when initially low in volume-resuscitated patients without acute bleeding.

Background: Alterations in skin blood flow is a marker of inadequate tissue perfusion in critically ill patients after initial resuscitation. The effects of red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) on skin perfusion are not described in this setting. We evaluated the effects of red blood cell transfusions on skin tissue perfusion in critically ill patients without acute bleeding after initial resuscitation. Methods: A prospective observational study included 175 non-bleeding adult patients after fluid resuscitation requiring red blood cell transfusions. Using laser Doppler, we measured finger skin blood flow (SBF) at skin basal temperature (SBFBT), together with mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), hemoglobin (Hb), central venous pressure (CVP), lactate, and central or mixed venous oxygen saturation before and 1 h after RBCT. SBF responders were those with a 20% increase in SBFBT after RBCT. Results: Overall, SBFBT did not significantly change after RBCT [from 79.8 (4.3-479.4) to 83.4 (4.9-561.6); p = 0.67]. A relative increase equal to or more than 20% in SBFBT after RBCT (SBF responders) was observed in 77/175 of RBCT (44%). SBF responders had significantly lower SBFBT [41.3 (4.3-279.3) vs. 136.3 (6.5-479.4) perfusion units; p < 0.01], mixed or central venous oxygen saturation (62.5 ± 9.2 vs. 67.3% ± 12.0%; p < 0.01) and CVP (8.3 ± 5.1 vs. 10.3 ± 5.6 mmHg; p = 0.03) at baseline than non-responders. SBFBT increased in responders [from 41.3 (4.3-279.3) to 93.1 (9.8-561.6) perfusion units; p < 0.01], and decreased in the non-responders [from 136.3 (6.5-479.4) to 80.0 (4.9-540.8) perfusion units; p < 0.01] after RBCT. Pre-transfusion SBFBT was independently associated with a 20% increase in SBFBT after RBCT. Baseline SBFBT had an area under receiver operator characteristic of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.68-0.83) to predict SBFBT increase; A SBFBT of 73.0 perfusion units (PU) had a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 70.4% to predict SBFBT increase after RBCT. No significant differences in SBFBT were observed after RBCT in different subgroup analyses. Conclusion: The skin blood flow is globally unaltered by red blood cell transfusions in non-bleeding critically ill patients after initial resuscitation. However, a lower SBFBT at baseline was associated with a relative increase in skin tissue perfusion after RBCT.

Factors Associated With Brain Tissue Oxygenation Changes After RBC Transfusion in Acute Brain Injury Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Anemia is common after acute brain injury and can be associated with brain tissue hypoxia. RBC transfusion (RBCT) can improve brain oxygenation; however, predictors of such improvement remain unknown. We aimed to identify the factors associated with PbtO2 increase (greater than 20% from baseline value) after RBCT, using a generalized mixed model. DESIGN: This is a multicentric retrospective cohort study (2012-2020). SETTING: This study was conducted in three European ICUs of University Hospitals located in Belgium, Switzerland, and Austria. PATIENTS: All patients with acute brain injury who were monitored with brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) catheters and received at least one RBCT. INTERVENTION: Patients received at least one RBCT. PbtO2 was recorded before, 1 hour, and 2 hours after RBCT. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 69 patients receiving a total of 109 RBCTs after a median of 9 days (5-13 d) after injury. Baseline hemoglobin (Hb) and PbtO2 were 7.9 g/dL [7.3-8.7 g/dL] and 21 mm Hg (16-26 mm Hg), respectively; 2 hours after RBCT, the median absolute Hb and PbtO2 increases from baseline were 1.2 g/dL [0.8-1.8 g/dL] (p = 0.001) and 3 mm Hg (0-6 mm Hg) (p = 0.001). A 20% increase in PbtO2 after RBCT was observed in 45 transfusions (41%). High heart rate (HR) and low PbtO2 at baseline were independently associated with a 20% increase in PbtO2 after RBCT. Baseline PbtO2 had an area under receiver operator characteristic of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64-0.83) to predict PbtO2 increase; a PbtO2 of 20 mm Hg had a sensitivity of 58% and a specificity of 73% to predict PbtO2 increase after RBCT. CONCLUSIONS: Lower PbtO2 values and high HR at baseline could predict a significant increase in brain oxygenation after RBCT.

How have red blood transfusion practices changed in critically ill patients? A comparison of the ICON and ABC studies conducted 13 years apart.

BACKGROUND: Optimal transfusion practice remains a matter of ongoing debate despite several large clinical studies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Databases from two observational studies-the Anemia and Blood Transfusion in Critically ill patients (ABC) conducted in 1999 and The Intensive Care Over Nations (ICON) audit conducted in 2012-were compared to evaluate changes in transfusion practice and outcomes over a 13-year period. RESULTS: A total of 3534 patients from the ABC study and 4125 from the ICON study were included in this analysis. ICON patients were more severely ill, with higher APACHE II and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores on admission than ABC patients; however, ICU mortality rates were similar (13.5% vs 13.8%, P = .745). The ICU transfusion rate was significantly lower in the ICON study (24% vs 37%, P < .001). APACHE II and SOFA scores were significantly higher in transfused patients in the ICON study than those in the ABC study (APACHE II: 22.0 ± 8.1 vs 16.5 ± 7.9, P < .001; SOFA: 8.4 ± 4.0 vs 6.6 ± 3.7, P < .001), but mortality rates were similar. Twenty-eight day mortality rates for patients who received more than 4 RBC units were lower in the ICON study (33.6% vs 44.8%, P = .006). CONCLUSION: The transfusion rate in ICU patients decreased during the 13-year period, despite patients being more severely ill in the more recent study; ICU mortality rates remained relatively stable. In patients who received more than 4 units of blood, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the more recent database.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effects of Transfusion on Hemodynamic and Oxygenation Variables.

OBJECTIVES: RBC transfusions can increase oxygen availability to the tissues, but studies have provided conflicting results. The objectives of this study were, therefore, to evaluate, using systematic review and meta-analysis, the effects of transfusion on hemodynamic/oxygenation variables in patients without acute bleeding. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase from inception until June 30, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: All articles that reported values of prespecified hemodynamic or oxygenation variables before and after RBC transfusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Publication year, number of patients, number of transfusions and the type of population studied, hemodynamic and oxygenation data (heart rate, cardiac index, mixed venous oxygen saturation or central venous oxygen saturation, oxygen delivery index, oxygen consumption index, oxygen extraction ratio, arteriovenous oxygen difference and arterial blood lactate) before and after transfusion. We performed a meta-analysis for each variable for which there were sufficient data to estimate mean differences. We also performed subgroup analyses comparing septic with nonseptic patients. DATA SYNTHESIS: We retrieved 6,420 studies; 33 met the inclusion criteria, 14 of which were in patients with sepsis. In the meta-analysis, the estimated mean differences and 95% CIs comparing the periods before and after transfusion were -0.0 L/min/m (-0.1 to 0.1 L/min/m) (p = 0.86) for cardiac index; -1.8 beats/min (-3.7 to 0.1 beats/min) (p = 0.06) for heart rate; 96.8 mL/min/m (71.1-122.5 mL/min/m) (p < 0.01) for oxygen delivery index; 2.9% (2.2-3.5%) (p < 0.01) for mixed venous oxygen saturation or central venous oxygen saturation; -3.7% (-4.4% to -3.0%) (p < 0.01) for oxygen extraction ratio; and 4.9 mL/min/m (0.9-9.0 mL/min/m) (p = 0.02) for oxygen consumption index. The estimated mean difference for oxygen consumption index in the patients with sepsis was 8.4 mL/min/m (2.3-14.5 mL/min/m; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion was not associated with a decrease in mean cardiac output or mean heart rate. The increase in mean oxygen delivery following transfusion was associated with an increase in mean oxygen consumption after transfusion, especially in patients with sepsis.